Which is better Zacks or Morningstar?

Which is better Zacks or Morningstar?

Zacks is much more quantitative in nature, while Morningstar uses fundamental analysis as a larger part of its recommendations. Morningstar appears to base its recommendations on an unbiased scale, while the Zacks Investment Research rating system is based solely on giving its members the most potential for profit.

Was a maul a real weapon?

Maul. A maul is a long-handled hammer with a heavy head, of wood, lead, or iron. A particular use of the maul was by archers in the 15th and 16th centuries. At the Battle of Agincourt, English longbowmen are recorded as using lead mauls, initially as a tool to drive in stakes but later as improvised weapons.

Is a maul a sledge hammer?

A splitting maul also known as a block buster, block splitter, chop and maul, sledge axe, go-devil or hamaxe is a heavy, long-handled axe used for splitting a piece of wood along its grain. One side of its head is like a sledgehammer, and the other side is like an axe.

What is the difference between a maul and a mace?

As nouns the difference between mace and maul is that mace is a heavy fighting club or mace can be an old money of account in china equal to one tenth of a tael while maul is a heavy long-handled hammer, used for splitting logs by driving a wedge into it, or in combat.

How large is a maul?

maul measures approximately 3.75 x 9 x 36 inches and has an eight-pound head with an overall weight of 12 pounds.

What is a post Maul?

A heavy sledgehammer with two identical flat faces.

Is a sledgehammer a good weapon?

But basically, no, a sledgehammer would not be a good weapon. It is way too heavy and unbalanced, even if you were very strong. A sledgehammer is far too slow and heavy to be used to block or divert an enemy sword stroke or thrust. The more the weight, the quicker you get tired.

Did 2 handed Warhammers exist?

The massive two handed weapons serve no real purpose when you think about it. Warhammers were often used in late medieval warfare when plate armour was increasingly popular and resistant to bladed weapons, which would glance off the armour.

What is better sword or mace?

Against mail or leather armor, a mace was far less effective than an axe or even a sword/spear thrust. But against plate armor, the mace was the only effective one-handed choice. Thus, the utility of the mace is predicated on the ubiquity of plate armor. Without plate armor, there was always a better choice on weapon.

Which is better sword or hammer?

In general the physics of a hack and slash attack is an extremely effective strike. A sword is better at this than hammer or axe because of the longer effective length of its blade.

Why is hammer the best weapon?

A hammer is a good weapon for self defense. It is slower than a knife because of the momentum, but I think it has better stopping power. You hit someone hard in the forearm with a hammer, and you likely disable his arm. You slash that same spot with a knife, and is still functioning, unless you slice it off cleanly.

Can you carry a hammer for self defense?

If you do hammer a guy in self defense and end up in a courtroom and it’s brought to light that you have training in a “hammer system” it might look very bad for you. if you carry a hammer with the intent of using it as a weapon you’ll probably end up in prison.

Does an AXE require less skill than a sword?

The sword, in trained hands, is a superior weapon to pretty much everything short of a gun. That’s why we used them for 3,000 years. However, skillful use of a sword against an armored foe takes a lifetime of training and discipline, and good swords have always been expensive. Axes require less steel and less finesse.